Exercise 1: In an effort to improve their program for teaching medical students how to speak effectively
Exercise 1:
In an effort to improve their program for teaching medical students how to speak effectively with patients, the following experiment was conducted. 20 year-three med students were randomly selected and randomly assigned into four groups of 5 students each. Group 1 attended traditional lectures, Group 2 was given a textbook of common situations and effective phrases, Group 3 was given a tape of professional physicians talking to their patients and Group 4 watched a real-life recording showing dr.-patient conversations. At the end of the semester, all 20 students were given the same oral exam on their ability to speak effectively with patients. The following scores were recorded:
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
| 75 | 68 | 80 | 87 |
| 70 | 73 | 65 | 90 |
| 90 | 70 | 70 | 85 |
| 80 | 60 | 68 | 75 |
| 75 | 65 | 72 | 80 |
- Use these data to perform One Way ANOVA at α = 0.05. Determine whether, in general, these 4 teaching methods have different mean effects on the ability to communicate with patients.
- Why would you choose One Way ANOVA instead of a two- sample t-test?
- Is it appropriate to perform a Tukey test to determine specific differences between means? If so, conduct the Tukey test and describe the results.
Exercise 2:
A researcher wants to evaluate the effectiveness of a new drug rehabilitation program. 10 participants are evaluated at the beginning, at the end and 3 months after completing the program. Ratings are on an interval scale, and lower ratings indicate less drug dependence than higher ratings. The data are contained in ‘Activity 8_Exercise2.sav’ data file.
- State the dependent and independent variable.
- What type of ANOVA is appropriate here? Why?
- State the null and alternative hypotheses.
- Run the appropriate ANOVA
- What are the assumptions and are they satisfied?
- Is post-hoc analysis needed? Why or why not?
- What is your conclusion?
Deliverable: Word Document
