CASE 1 : Scarr Crick explored the incidence of altrusim in people with different blood groups. Among people
CASE 1 : Scarr & Crick explored the incidence of altrusim in people with different blood groups. Among people with O+ blood group 50 believed in ethical treatment of animals, 20 in philanthropy, and 30 in reciprocity. Among people with AB+ blood group 30 believed in ethical treatment, 45 in philanthropy and 25 in reciprocity.
- What are the researchers’ Null & Research hypotheses? [6 points]
- What statistic will you use? Set up the test and calculate the statistic. [10 points]
- What is the critical value (from table, for = 0.05)? What are your df? What are your conclusions? [4 points]
Total: 20 points
CASE 2 : The following problems use the binomial [5 point each]:
- At a certain intersection, the light for eastbound traffic is red for 15 seconds, yellow for 5 seconds, and green for 30 seconds. Find the probability that out of the next eight eastbound cars that arrive randomly at the light, exactly three will be stopped by a red light.
- According to historical weather data, 73% of the days in March are rainy in Seattle. If you go to Seattle for four days in March, what is the probability that all four days will be rainy?
- In a certain city, 65% of all dog bites lead to rabies. If 20 people in that city are bitten by dogs in a given week, what is the probability that no more than 17 of them will get rabies?
- For the city in question (iii), what is the mean number of people that contract rabies in a week when 25 people are bitten? What is the standard deviation?
Total: 20 points
CASE 3 : Researchers want to examine the effect of perceived control on health complaints of geriatric patients in a long-term care facility. Twenty patients are randomly selected. Half are given a plant to care for and half are given a plant but the staff take care of it. The number of health complaints are recorded for each patient over the following 7 days.
Control over Plant No Control over Plant
23 35
12 21
6 26
15 24
18 17
5 23
21 37
18 22
34 16
10 38
- What are the Null and Alternate hypotheses? [5 points].
- Compute the appropriate statistic and give your conclusions. [5 points].
- What is the effect size and power for this data? What is the probability of a Type I and a Type II error in this situation? Which is greater? Explain your answer [10 points].
Total: 20 points
CASE 4 : Researchers at Vanderbilt’s Virtual Reality lab have looked at people’s angular errors when they walk in a virtual environment (VE) and real environment (RE). Here is a portion of the data that the researchers obtained when they tested people in 3 different virtual "rooms," [VE data presented in the top half] and 3 corresponding real rooms [RE data presented in the lower half]. The researchers wanted to see whether the rooms differed in the errors participants produced, and in the response times in each room.
| Subject | 1 st room | 2 nd room | 3 rd room | Means |
|
A
B C D E |
24
33 30 32 22 |
15
25 30 23 32 |
20
22 30 29 26 |
19.67
26.67 30 28 26.67 |
| Means (VE) | 28.2 | 25 | 25.4 | |
|
A
B C D E |
22
32 20 22 31 |
32
23 20 27 22 |
22
24 20 26 25 |
25.33
26.33 20 25 26 |
| Means (RE) | 25.4 | 24.8 | 23.4 |
- Give the Null Hypothesis and Alternate Hypothesis. [10 points]
- Do the appropriate test and give the summary table. [25 points].
- What are your conclusions? [5 points]
Total points = 40
Deliverable: Word Document
