QUESTIONS: #1. Interpret the results of the two models. #2. Were these models "good fits" of the y-variable?
QUESTIONS:
#1. Interpret the results of the two models.
#2. Were these models "good fits" of the y-variable? Explain.
#3. Which variables were the best predictors of the real GDP growth rate in 2013?
#4. Which is the better model? Explain.
#5. What can we learn comparing Model A to Model B? Explain.
#6. The population variable LOGPOP is insignificant, should I throw it out of the model?
#7. According to the Phillips Curve, Unemployment Rate and Inflation Rate are inversely related. What explains the negative sign on the coefficients for both Unemployment and Inflation?
#8. The Unemployment Rate variable was one of the more powerful predictors of real GDP growth rate, what would be the rationale be for dropping Unemployment Rate from the specification?
#9. The constant term was statistically significant in both Models, which estimate should be believed?
#10. Why did the WAR variable fall apart in Model B? #11. In an international dataset, why does is the proportionate number of old people in society negatively correlated with the economic growth rate?
#12. If the negative coefficient on ELDERLY makes sense, why is the coefficient on YOUTH also negative? Suggest a "specification based" solution to this question of the relationship of age to real GDP growth rate.
Deliverable: Word Document
