(Steps Shown) Task 5b: Delana Lightfoot is a production analyst at the Golden Kernel processing plant, which processes whole-kernel cut corn. Delana’s current
Question:
Task 5b: Delana Lightfoot is a production analyst at the Golden Kernel processing plant, which processes whole-kernel cut corn. Delana’s current project is to evaluate different levels of automation for quality control inspection of corn kernels. Option 1 is to assign a number of employees along the conveyor belt to inspect the corn kernels manually as they go by and pick out small and off-color kernels. Option 2 involves using fewer employees who only check for off-color kernels and then running the corn over a screen that filters out the small kernels. Option 3 is to purchase a state-of—the-art, fully auto- mated machine that uses video cameras, a computer workstation, and small bursts of air. This new machine can automatically inspect individual kernels of corn for size and color as the conveyer belt moves the kernels in a single layer by the machine. Inferior kernels are removed by a precisely placed small burst of air as the kernels pass over a perforated air tube. As Delana expected, the initial costs of the options vary substantially. She investigated the cost of each option and has summarized the information in the following table:
| Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | |
| Annual Fixed Cost | 2500 | 4500 | 27000 |
| Variable cost | 100 | 80 | 20 |
-
Based on annual cost, determine the annual volume (in thousands of pounds) at
which the company would be indifferent between Option 1 and Option 2; between
Option 2 and Option 3; and between Option 1 and Option 3. -
Create a table showing the total annual cost of each option if annual volume (in
thousands of pounds) is 50, 200, 350, and 500. Circle the lowest cost at each annual volume. -
Based only on annual cost, for what range of annual volumes would each option
be preferred? - What factors other than annual cost should be considered when making this decision?
Deliverable: Word Document 