Question: Check Amounts In the trial of State of Arizona vs. Wayne James Nelson, the defendant was accused of issuing checks to a vendor that did not really exist. The amounts of the checks wed below in order by row. When testing for goodness-of-fit with the proportions expected with Benford's law, it is necessary to combine categories because not all expected values at least 5. Use one category with leading digits of 1, a second category with leading digits 2.3, 4,5, and a third category with leading digits of 6, 7, 8, 9. Using a 0.01 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the leading digits on the checks do not conform to Benford's law?

Price: $2.99

Solution: The downloadable solution consists of 3 pages
Deliverable: Word Document